Six studios spent a week letting the models draft. What came back wasn't faster, it was louder. We went through every frame to find what's worth keeping, and the five prompts that changed how we work.
ArchiGen is a curated editorial platform for architects, archviz artists and design-forward studios figuring out where AI fits into the drawing set.
We test, we compare, we publish what's useful and put the rest down. Magazine on the cover, library underneath.
The fastest way we've found to go from SketchUp massing to a publishable render. Architectural priors, exposed seed, and enough control not to feel like a slot machine.
Best for iterating in front of a client. Real-time canvas, weak at plans.
Our go-to base. Understands materials. Struggles with scale. Needs a LoRA.
Still the best at atmosphere. Worst at geometry. Use for the front of the book, not the set.
Boring, fast, reliable. The last node in nine of our ten workflows.
Underrated for site-plan mood work. Pair with a trained checkpoint.
Grasshopper integration that actually respects tolerances. Ugly UI, good bones.
One week of 2026 render roundups named six different tools as the best. The disagreement is not noise. It is a signal about who is doing the scoring, and it points you straight at a faster way to read any list.